Farm Subsidy information
Van Buren County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Van Buren County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,890
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Van Buren County, Iowa totaled $241,270,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Niederhuth Ag Ltd | Stockport, IA 52651 | $249,759 |
182 | Gary E Loeffler | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $249,478 |
183 | James A Poulter | Chelsea, MI 48118 | $249,194 |
184 | Andrew J Downey Jr | Mount Sterling, IA 52573 | $247,603 |
185 | C Earl Dixon | Cape May, NJ 08204 | $247,407 |
186 | Twyla Peacock | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $245,590 |
187 | Burton Eads | Milton, IA 52570 | $243,641 |
188 | Keith W Boley Jr -the Keith W Boley Jr And Jane S | Cantril, IA 52542 | $241,896 |
189 | Paul H Wenke | Milton, IA 52570 | $241,774 |
190 | Ervin L Taeger | Stockport, IA 52651 | $241,710 |
191 | Carl B Conrad | West Point, IA 52656 | $241,451 |
192 | Max C Westercamp | Bonaparte, IA 52620 | $241,117 |
193 | Group 46 LLC | Pilot Grove, IA 52648 | $240,139 |
194 | King Family Farms Lc | Cedar Rapids, IA 52411 | $236,693 |
195 | Russell Gordy | Memphis, MO 63555 | $236,035 |
196 | Linda S Laughlin Trust | Douds, IA 52551 | $235,591 |
197 | Ryan Andrew Noll | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $235,061 |
198 | Muhs Farms Lllp | Stockport, IA 52651 | $234,629 |
199 | Hatch Machine Company Inc | Milton, IA 52570 | $233,047 |
200 | Cs Homes LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $232,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”