Conservation Reserve Program in Wapello County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 387
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wapello County, Iowa totaled $3,838,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Mark Carlton | Albia, IA 52531 | $26,472 |
42 | James Dickey Sterling | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $26,307 |
43 | Joan Elaine Sterling | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $26,307 |
44 | Jeffrey Harold Emery | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $25,193 |
45 | Cindy Marie Emery | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $25,193 |
46 | James Edward Woodruff | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $25,120 |
47 | Sheryl North | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $24,746 |
48 | Donald W Sandifer | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $24,564 |
49 | Curtis Jager | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $24,137 |
50 | Ksa Trust | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $23,314 |
51 | Sloan Farms Inc | Eldon, IA 52554 | $23,238 |
52 | Mr Kevin L Peters | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $22,752 |
53 | Fredrick Wayne Hale | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $22,475 |
54 | Ryan Jeffrey Van Maanen | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $22,131 |
55 | Neal E Mcmullin Revocable Trust Agreement | Batavia, IA 52533 | $22,101 |
56 | Gardner Farms Inc | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $21,566 |
57 | Robert Reck | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $21,226 |
58 | Terry L Willhoit Revocable Trust Agreement | Batavia, IA 52533 | $20,759 |
59 | Mark E Willhoit Revocable Trust Agreement | Batavia, IA 52533 | $20,756 |
60 | Timothy A Kittel | Unionville, IA 52594 | $20,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”