Conservation Reserve Program in Warren County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 538
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Warren County, Iowa totaled $4,776,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rodney A Dittmer | Lacona, IA 50139 | $34,919 |
22 | Joseph M Brennan Irrevocable Trust | Indianola, IA 50125 | $34,197 |
23 | Carlisle's Summit Farm Ltd | Carlisle, IA 50047 | $33,509 |
24 | Joel R Allison | Milo, IA 50166 | $33,460 |
25 | Bobby J Byers Revocable Trust | Milo, IA 50166 | $33,199 |
26 | The Andrew L Roberts And Beth A Roberts Revocable | Des Moines, IA 50321 | $32,533 |
27 | Rosanna Metz | Lacona, IA 50139 | $32,487 |
28 | Sharon J Torno | Nevada, IA 50201 | $32,250 |
29 | William E Trickey-& Vicky Stout Rev Trust | Truro, IA 50257 | $31,625 |
30 | , | $30,914 | |
31 | Elizabeth A Wachter Revocable Trust | Milo, IA 50166 | $28,578 |
32 | , | $28,384 | |
33 | Helen V Ripperger Trust | Indianola, IA 50125 | $28,066 |
34 | Jamie Franek | Lonsdale, MN 55046 | $27,528 |
35 | Thomas D Bower | Indianola, IA 50125 | $27,427 |
36 | Michael Joseph Miller | Indianola, IA 50125 | $27,400 |
37 | George Farms LLC | Ankeny, IA 50021 | $25,732 |
38 | Paul Wilken | Huxley, IA 50124 | $25,729 |
39 | Merrill Dean Weeks | Indianola, IA 50125 | $25,358 |
40 | John E Hutchcroft-hutchcroft Trust | Prole, IA 50229 | $24,724 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”