Conservation Reserve Program in Washington County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 973
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Washington County, Iowa totaled $7,973,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Robert M & Darlene E Flynn Irrevocable Trust II | Iowa City, IA 52246 | $17,505 |
142 | Janet Dickerson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $17,425 |
143 | Robert Winkleblack | Riverside, IA 52327 | $17,378 |
144 | Douglas Wayne Shalla | Kalona, IA 52247 | $17,338 |
145 | Larry Yeggy | Ainsworth, IA 52201 | $17,320 |
146 | Melissa Holway | Tiffin, IA 52340 | $17,315 |
147 | Bradley Marek | Riverside, IA 52327 | $17,252 |
148 | Timothy Dale Stultz | Ainsworth, IA 52201 | $17,209 |
149 | Gregory Gent | Wellman, IA 52356 | $17,138 |
150 | Mitch Greiner | Washington, IA 52353 | $17,123 |
151 | Katherine D Pacha | Washington, IA 52353 | $17,093 |
152 | Jeremiah Godfrey Sheetz | Keota, IA 52248 | $16,945 |
153 | Kevin Curtis Flynn | Wellman, IA 52356 | $16,942 |
154 | Dorothy Wenger-wenger Family Trust | Wayland, IA 52654 | $16,902 |
155 | William J Walker | Wayland, IA 52654 | $16,861 |
156 | Mary Chmelar | Washington, IA 52353 | $16,853 |
157 | Dennis Walton | Marengo, IA 52301 | $16,666 |
158 | The Chalupa Trust | Washington, IA 52353 | $16,616 |
159 | Stumpf Development Inc | Riverside, IA 52327 | $16,517 |
160 | Brandon Statler | Washington, IA 52353 | $16,449 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”