Market Gains in Webster County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 600
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Webster County, Iowa totaled $7,654,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth Earl George | Clare, IA 50524 | $43,460 |
42 | Ruth Margaret Schmalenberger | Vincent, IA 50594 | $43,458 |
43 | Brian Harold Lambert | Dayton, IA 50530 | $43,148 |
44 | Gordon E Jondle | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $41,612 |
45 | D B Myers Inc | Lehigh, IA 50557 | $40,960 |
46 | Richard Michael Liska Revocable Trust | Callender, IA 50523 | $40,572 |
47 | James Alvin Stewart | Burnside, IA 50521 | $39,064 |
48 | Francis Prendergast | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $38,758 |
49 | David Paul Mickelson | Lehigh, IA 50557 | $38,248 |
50 | Jeffrey Charles Peterson | Dayton, IA 50530 | $38,028 |
51 | Richard Francis Allen | Clare, IA 50524 | $37,755 |
52 | Miller Acres Inc | Harcourt, IA 50544 | $37,459 |
53 | Terrance Eugene Condon | Clare, IA 50524 | $36,649 |
54 | Paul-kehoe Family Tr Edward Kehoe | Callender, IA 50523 | $35,951 |
55 | Harold Fred Lambert | Dayton, IA 50530 | $35,662 |
56 | Sorenson Family Inc | Centennial, CO 80112 | $35,574 |
57 | Irvy J Badger | Moorland, IA 50566 | $35,098 |
58 | Roger Walter Peterson | Harcourt, IA 50544 | $34,473 |
59 | James Anton Allen | Clare, IA 50524 | $34,164 |
60 | David Wayne Olson | Otho, IA 50569 | $34,106 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”