Farm Subsidy information
Webster County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Webster County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,645
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Webster County, Iowa totaled $43,244,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Joshua Joab Anderson | Dayton, IA 50530 | $140,573 |
| 42 | Ricke James Hotz | Clare, IA 50524 | $136,294 |
| 43 | Gary Alan Mccart | Eagle Grove, IA 50533 | $134,245 |
| 44 | Prendergast Ent Inc | Callender, IA 50523 | $133,280 |
| 45 | Kenneth William Mcelroy | Clare, IA 50524 | $133,268 |
| 46 | Michael Dennis Crouse | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $132,019 |
| 47 | Keith E Brock | Webster City, IA 50595 | $129,528 |
| 48 | Lundgren Farms Ptnp | Lehigh, IA 50557 | $127,899 |
| 49 | Michael Ray Kauffman | Harcourt, IA 50544 | $127,845 |
| 50 | Dawn Mickelson | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $125,805 |
| 51 | Terrance J Lawler | Clare, IA 50524 | $124,568 |
| 52 | Kenneth E Gansz | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $123,415 |
| 53 | William Sylvester Secor Jr | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $122,862 |
| 54 | Irvy J Badger | Moorland, IA 50566 | $122,059 |
| 55 | Timothy James Coppinger | Barnum, IA 50518 | $118,634 |
| 56 | Kirk Raymond Seltz | Badger, IA 50516 | $118,521 |
| 57 | Timothy Barrett | Moorland, IA 50566 | $117,295 |
| 58 | Patsy L Brock | Webster City, IA 50595 | $116,580 |
| 59 | Vance Alan Bauer | Gowrie, IA 50543 | $116,530 |
| 60 | Dana Allen Hotz | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $116,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf