Market Gains in Winnebago County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 486
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Winnebago County, Iowa totaled $16,151,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Allan Dean Van Hove | Thompson, IA 50478 | $51,940 |
102 | Tracy Ivern Thompson | Forest City, IA 50436 | $50,921 |
103 | Terry Ivan Thompson | Forest City, IA 50436 | $50,714 |
104 | Cynthia Lou Wooge | Forest City, IA 50436 | $50,229 |
105 | John A Eilertson | Kiester, MN 56051 | $50,079 |
106 | Henry Duane Sunde | Scarville, IA 50473 | $50,078 |
107 | Jeffrey Bruce Willmert | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $49,340 |
108 | Kennath A Stenberg | Leland, IA 50453 | $48,527 |
109 | James Brenden Anderson | Leland, IA 50453 | $48,465 |
110 | Heartland Enterprises Inc | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $48,105 |
111 | Jim John Badje | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $47,513 |
112 | Bonnie Jean Doden | Woden, IA 50484 | $46,563 |
113 | Laurence Alan Doden | Woden, IA 50484 | $46,562 |
114 | Brian Robert Knudtson | Forest City, IA 50436 | $46,475 |
115 | Larry E Stohr Revocable Trust | Thompson, IA 50478 | $46,420 |
116 | Sterling Dennis Meyer | Thompson, IA 50478 | $45,822 |
117 | Edward Eugene Hippen | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $44,755 |
118 | Luther E Alm Estate | Forest City, IA 50436 | $44,610 |
119 | David Laverne Brue Estate | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $44,293 |
120 | Gerald Nelson | Kiester, MN 56051 | $44,127 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”