Conservation Reserve Program in Winnebago County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,541
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Winnebago County, Iowa totaled $56,828,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale E Helgeland | Leland, IA 50453 | $269,870 |
22 | Kari Larson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $267,653 |
23 | John A Johnson | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $266,166 |
24 | Ronald L Mathews | Leland, IA 50453 | $256,406 |
25 | Valere & Elaine Nelson Rev Trust | Forest City, IA 50436 | $255,893 |
26 | Agnes Christ | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $255,349 |
27 | Sleper Farms Inc | Titonka, IA 50480 | $253,326 |
28 | Aaron Charlson | Forest City, IA 50436 | $233,917 |
29 | Andrew Johnson | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $233,562 |
30 | Billy L Swearingen | Thompson, IA 50478 | $233,110 |
31 | Inez Heimdal | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $229,682 |
32 | Eisenhauer Farms Ltd | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $228,521 |
33 | Main Inc | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $228,456 |
34 | Harvey G Nyhus | Forest City, IA 50436 | $228,228 |
35 | Gayle Koetke | Cologne, MN 55322 | $225,554 |
36 | Oswald Rognes | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $223,122 |
37 | Scd Farm Partnership | Joice, IA 50446 | $220,146 |
38 | Alan Lyle Divan | Scarville, IA 50473 | $218,055 |
39 | Thompson Family Enterprises, Inc. | Forest City, IA 50436 | $216,356 |
40 | Karin Carlson 2001 Revocable Trust | Forest City, IA 50436 | $215,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”