Farm Subsidy information
Woodbury County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Woodbury County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,500
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Woodbury County, Iowa totaled $678,447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Weaver Brothers Farms LLC | Moville, IA 51039 | $1,537,288 |
22 | W C Farms Ltd | Oto, IA 51044 | $1,517,266 |
23 | Sloan Welding & Construction Co Inc | Sloan, IA 51055 | $1,514,084 |
24 | Joel Seglem | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,502,890 |
25 | Dennis Gallagher | Hornick, IA 51026 | $1,500,436 |
26 | Oehlerking Brothers Ptn | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $1,468,081 |
27 | R & L Seuntjens Farm Inc | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $1,465,729 |
28 | Richard Benson | Anthon, IA 51004 | $1,447,704 |
29 | Mark E Williams | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $1,428,453 |
30 | Roger E Rand Estate | Sioux City, IA 51102 | $1,424,448 |
31 | Kurt Nash | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,423,365 |
32 | Shane Lynn Williams | Bronson, IA 51007 | $1,418,656 |
33 | J M Farms Inc | Sloan, IA 51055 | $1,380,827 |
34 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $1,375,681 |
35 | Allan Pithan | Anthon, IA 51004 | $1,343,203 |
36 | Marlin L Groth | Moville, IA 51039 | $1,314,787 |
37 | Dennis Ortner | Danbury, IA 51019 | $1,282,430 |
38 | Kenneth Warren Kollbaum | Anthon, IA 51004 | $1,269,563 |
39 | Hunt Farms Partnership | Salix, IA 51052 | $1,268,645 |
40 | Brian D Peterson | Lawton, IA 51030 | $1,263,710 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”