Conservation Reserve Program in Woodbury County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 515
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Woodbury County, Iowa totaled $9,124,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael J Hanlon | Neosho, MO 64850 | $48,791 |
22 | Jeff Bremer | Moville, IA 51039 | $48,412 |
23 | Jackie Bremer | Moville, IA 51039 | $48,412 |
24 | D Winkel & Sons LLC | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $48,306 |
25 | Riddell Family Ltd Ptn | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $48,142 |
26 | Julie B Thornton | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $48,023 |
27 | Diane Ruth Bartels | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $48,023 |
28 | Ann L Mrla Rev Trust | Lawton, IA 51030 | $47,992 |
29 | Margaret M Turchen - The Turchen Family 1991 Trust | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $47,969 |
30 | Kelly Weaver | Moville, IA 51039 | $47,116 |
31 | Edward J Leahy Rev Trust | Sac City, IA 50583 | $47,112 |
32 | Larry L Wink | Anthon, IA 51004 | $47,030 |
33 | J M Farms Inc | Sloan, IA 51055 | $46,980 |
34 | Vicky Thomas | Correctionville, IA 51016 | $46,532 |
35 | Michael S Huber | Mccook Lake, SD 57049 | $46,343 |
36 | Debra A Huber | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $46,343 |
37 | Robert Merrill Rogers Irrev Trust | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $45,751 |
38 | Frank Yanak Jr | Sloan, IA 51055 | $45,450 |
39 | Wagner Farm Enterprises LLC | Salix, IA 51052 | $45,318 |
40 | Jonathan A Liechty Revocable Living Trust | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $45,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”