Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Worth County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 87
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Worth County, Iowa totaled $2,447,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Dale Janssen | Northwood, IA 50459 | $49,716 |
22 | Randal Dean Sime | Northwood, IA 50459 | $47,322 |
23 | David Edward Peterson | Northwood, IA 50459 | $42,748 |
24 | Mark Douglas Urbatsch | Manly, IA 50456 | $42,332 |
25 | Keith A Braun | Northwood, IA 50459 | $41,541 |
26 | Dean Arthur Moretz | Northwood, IA 50459 | $40,033 |
27 | C B Neel And Sons Inc | Manly, IA 50456 | $35,809 |
28 | Warren Lee Brackey | Joice, IA 50446 | $35,775 |
29 | Dahl Farms Inc | Manly, IA 50456 | $34,667 |
30 | Zane Steve Arzberger | Northwood, IA 50459 | $33,945 |
31 | Harlan Irvin Benjegerdes | Manly, IA 50456 | $31,707 |
32 | Brian Jay Tweeten | Kensett, IA 50448 | $31,635 |
33 | Dandyland Farms | Garner, IA 50438 | $31,498 |
34 | Larry Alton Johnson | Hanlontown, IA 50444 | $31,048 |
35 | Michael Alan Stevens | Northwood, IA 50459 | $27,972 |
36 | Steven James Richeson | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $26,466 |
37 | Mark Alan Lovik | Joice, IA 50446 | $22,076 |
38 | Enderson Farms Inc | Manly, IA 50456 | $21,263 |
39 | R D L Farms Inc | Mason City, IA 50401 | $19,940 |
40 | D. And E. Sandberg Living Trust | Phoenix, AZ 85053 | $18,887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”