Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,493
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Kansas totaled $33,245,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Corpstein Farms | Atchison, KS 66002 | $154,329 |
22 | David T Walker | Johnson, KS 67855 | $153,034 |
23 | Mark A Ensz | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $150,182 |
24 | Jeffrey A Strnad Tr No 1 | Scandia, KS 66966 | $147,157 |
25 | Schumacher Farm & Ranch LLC | Leoti, KS 67861 | $143,583 |
26 | Quentin T Maupin | Paradise, KS 67658 | $141,536 |
27 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $140,978 |
28 | Roger T Holthaus And Jolene M Holthaus Rev Trust | Seneca, KS 66538 | $127,934 |
29 | Les Baumgartner Inc | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $127,764 |
30 | Tri Bar M | Ashland, KS 67831 | $125,156 |
31 | Rupert Land And Cattle Company Inc | Minneapolis, KS 67467 | $125,000 |
32 | Steven L Macke | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $124,305 |
33 | John M Fisher | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $116,375 |
34 | Mark Bontrager | Holton, KS 66436 | $109,856 |
35 | Tony Chrisler | Natoma, KS 67651 | $109,315 |
36 | Rocking P LLC | Paradise, KS 67658 | $108,471 |
37 | Michael Nelson | Leonardville, KS 66449 | $107,141 |
38 | Gene R Angel | Paradise, KS 67658 | $105,745 |
39 | Roger J Macke | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $104,856 |
40 | Bh Cattle LLC | Canyon, TX 79015 | $104,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”