Conservation Reserve Program in Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,964
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Kansas totaled $75,705,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Renick / Reynolds | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $52,534 |
22 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $50,547 |
23 | Cooper Grain Inc | Colby, KS 67701 | $50,000 |
24 | Graham Farms | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $50,000 |
25 | Finnup Foundation Trust | Garden City, KS 67846 | $50,000 |
26 | Lpr Inc | Russell Springs, KS 67764 | $50,000 |
27 | Kent L Powell | Kalvesta, KS 67835 | $50,000 |
28 | J V Kuttler & Sons Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $50,000 |
29 | Alvin L Collins Rev Trust | Wray, CO 80758 | $50,000 |
30 | Tom Groe | Lakewood, CA 90712 | $50,000 |
31 | Oldham Farms LLC | Leoti, KS 67861 | $50,000 |
32 | Southeast Kansas Farming Inc | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $50,000 |
33 | Colt W Hurley | Garden City, KS 67846 | $50,000 |
34 | , | $50,000 | |
35 | Kenny Tilley | Johnson, KS 67855 | $49,882 |
36 | Tim Jaeger | Wichita, KS 67219 | $49,594 |
37 | Sheryl Y Jaeger | Wichita, KS 67219 | $49,594 |
38 | T & C Culwell Lp | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $49,474 |
39 | Nick Peterson | Lakin, KS 67860 | $49,434 |
40 | Amanda M Peterson | Lakin, KS 67860 | $49,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”