Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 356
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Kansas totaled $293,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Preisser | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $3,483 |
22 | Lewis Unruh Living Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $3,405 |
23 | Briggeman West Partnership | Pratt, KS 67124 | $3,350 |
24 | Kenneth M Hower Rev Trust | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $3,334 |
25 | Robert - L Harder Rev Trust | Benton, KS 67017 | $3,114 |
26 | Daniel Deepe | Douglass, KS 67039 | $2,513 |
27 | Ternes Farms Inc | Peck, KS 67120 | $2,467 |
28 | Gordon Busenitz Inc | Newton, KS 67114 | $2,398 |
29 | Steve Osburn | Elk City, KS 67344 | $2,373 |
30 | Joel-ensz & Marcia G Ensz | Valley Center, KS 67147 | $2,242 |
31 | John T & Myrtle I Posey Revocable | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $2,213 |
32 | Michael Dean Schauf | Douglass, KS 67039 | $1,956 |
33 | Phillip E Kreidler Trust | Geuda Springs, KS 67051 | $1,922 |
34 | Curt Hoobler | Mulvane, KS 67110 | $1,864 |
35 | Jason & Anna Unruh Family Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $1,803 |
36 | Paul - Paul Eubank T Eubank | Pratt, KS 67124 | $1,767 |
37 | Betty - Betty Eubank J Eubank | Pratt, KS 67124 | $1,767 |
38 | Metz Farms Partnership | Oxford, KS 67119 | $1,763 |
39 | Ricky Totten | Oxford, KS 67119 | $1,757 |
40 | James Robert Smart | La Harpe, KS 66751 | $1,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”