Livestock Subsidies in Kansas, 2018
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 10,487
Recipients of Livestock Subsidies from farms in Kansas totaled $53,538,000 in in 2018.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Subsidies 2018 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Giles Ranch Company LLC * | Ashland, KS 67831 | $718,912 |
2 | Kohman Dairy LLC | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $558,440 |
3 | Gardiner Angus Ranch * | Ashland, KS 67831 | $458,505 |
4 | Jim K Miller | Overland Park, KS 66283 | $327,902 |
5 | Cooper Honey LLC | Wichita, KS 67227 | $158,428 |
6 | Schumacher Farm & Ranch LLC * | Leoti, KS 67861 | $143,583 |
7 | Arndt Farms % M L Arndt * | Emporia, KS 66801 | $136,892 |
8 | J-six Farms LLC * | Seneca, KS 66538 | $128,094 |
9 | Keesecker Agri Business Inc * | Washington, KS 66968 | $125,000 |
10 | Promax Inc * | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $125,000 |
11 | Haverkamp Bros Inc * | Seneca, KS 66538 | $125,000 |
12 | Henry Pork, LLC | Longford, KS 67458 | $125,000 |
13 | Steven Cox Associates LLC * | Long Island, KS 67647 | $125,000 |
14 | Snyder Ranch * | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $117,548 |
15 | Woolfolk Ranch LLC * | Protection, KS 67127 | $116,750 |
16 | Porter Cattle Co * | Reading, KS 66868 | $116,135 |
17 | Jack Jones Inc * | Emporia, KS 66801 | $115,431 |
18 | Hartter Brothers Pork, LLC | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $111,920 |
19 | Snake Creek Ranch * | Ashland, KS 67831 | $108,671 |
20 | Western Pacific Farms Inc * | Copeland, KS 67837 | $105,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.