Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,170
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Kansas totaled $59,378,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | K & M Farms Inc | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $219,477 |
22 | Phimar Inc | Buhler, KS 67522 | $217,294 |
23 | Jerome Troike | Walnut, KS 66780 | $217,031 |
24 | Jason B Spencer | Garnett, KS 66032 | $216,898 |
25 | Boos Farms Inc | Severance, KS 66087 | $216,302 |
26 | Kopfer Farms Inc | Oakhill, KS 67432 | $213,840 |
27 | Michael Spencer | Colony, KS 66015 | $210,968 |
28 | Mccurry Brothers Angus | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $204,128 |
29 | Timmons Bros Farms Inc | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $203,813 |
30 | Raymond Spencer | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $203,447 |
31 | Burkdoll Brothers Inc | Rantoul, KS 66079 | $203,216 |
32 | Caldwell Farms Inc | Garnett, KS 66032 | $196,612 |
33 | Don J Garlow | Concordia, KS 66901 | $190,107 |
34 | Sundstrom Farms Inc | Ottawa, KS 66067 | $186,093 |
35 | Lone Elm Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $185,328 |
36 | Berk Inc | Concordia, KS 66901 | $185,043 |
37 | Lloyd Farms Inc | Oakhill, KS 67432 | $184,377 |
38 | Garetson Brothers Partnership | Sublette, KS 67877 | $183,600 |
39 | Browns Creek Farms Inc | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $183,497 |
40 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $178,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”