Total Commodity Programs in Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72,102
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kansas totaled $1,226,000,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J-six Farms LLC | Seneca, KS 66538 | $683,739 |
22 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $664,406 |
23 | K & K Farms | Herndon, KS 67739 | $660,042 |
24 | Nicholson Ventures | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $632,432 |
25 | Lone Tree Farm, Gp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $623,208 |
26 | Ray Enterprises | Winfield, KS 67156 | $612,195 |
27 | Barnhardt Farms Partnership | Lakin, KS 67860 | $611,733 |
28 | Peterson Farm Partnership | Lebanon, KS 66952 | $606,625 |
29 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $600,265 |
30 | James And Son Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $598,950 |
31 | Hamilton Brothers | Ensign, KS 67841 | $593,275 |
32 | Mcclure Brothers Land & Cattle Operating Ptr | Douglass, KS 67039 | $585,246 |
33 | Harshberger Enterprises | Minneola, KS 67865 | $576,331 |
34 | Dirks Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $559,520 |
35 | Butts Brothers Partnership | Mulvane, KS 67110 | $546,620 |
36 | Stewart And Roshel Stabel Jv | Lakin, KS 67860 | $543,384 |
37 | 4-d Farms | Moscow, KS 67952 | $542,479 |
38 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $539,173 |
39 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $537,321 |
40 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $523,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”