Farm Subsidy information
Anderson County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Anderson County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 755
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Anderson County, Kansas totaled $9,453,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Spur Lake Cattle Co.-kansas LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $14,092 |
102 | Frank Hoff | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $13,605 |
103 | Cherry Creek Farms | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $13,587 |
104 | Rod Wittman | Garnett, KS 66032 | $13,556 |
105 | Norman & Helen Elliss Living Trust | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $13,339 |
106 | Stan Boots | Welda, KS 66091 | $12,287 |
107 | Blayne A Keith | Garnett, KS 66032 | $12,249 |
108 | Joseph Sprague | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $12,196 |
109 | Ryan J Tastove | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $12,177 |
110 | Eugene Highberger Liv Tr | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $12,156 |
111 | Mark A Feuerborn | Richmond, KS 66080 | $12,054 |
112 | David A Schuster | Richmond, KS 66080 | $12,033 |
113 | Randy Bunnel | Welda, KS 66091 | $11,894 |
114 | David Milner | Welda, KS 66091 | $11,766 |
115 | Nathan Craig Mentzer | Colony, KS 66015 | $11,341 |
116 | Robert A Schehrer Rev Trust | Lawrence, KS 66049 | $11,242 |
117 | Dean W Shilling | Westphalia, KS 66093 | $11,187 |
118 | Nooland Farms Inc | Currie, MN 56123 | $11,185 |
119 | Lyle R Noomen | Currie, MN 56123 | $11,185 |
120 | Jason Katzer | Garnett, KS 66032 | $11,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”