Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Atchison County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 757
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Atchison County, Kansas totaled $5,098,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ronald E Lane | Valley Falls, KS 66088 | $11,800 |
122 | Donald Stucker | Lancaster, KS 66041 | $11,724 |
123 | Neal D Keeler | Whiting, KS 66552 | $11,619 |
124 | Larry Rogers | Horton, KS 66439 | $11,477 |
125 | Leroy Ellerman | Effingham, KS 66023 | $11,379 |
126 | Bunck Seed Farms Inc | Everest, KS 66424 | $11,359 |
127 | James Schletzbaum | Atchison, KS 66002 | $11,356 |
128 | Steve Kelly | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $11,240 |
129 | G E Rork Liv Rev Trust | Horton, KS 66439 | $11,207 |
130 | Becker Cedar Ridge Inc | Denton, KS 66017 | $10,987 |
131 | H Keith Taliaferro | Effingham, KS 66023 | $10,954 |
132 | Charles Chester Trust | Saint George, KS 66535 | $10,771 |
133 | Brian E Potter | Easton, KS 66020 | $10,752 |
134 | Martha C Morton | Fort Worth, TX 76109 | $10,501 |
135 | Robert Schletzbaum | Atchison, KS 66002 | $10,486 |
136 | Carolyn M Fuhrman Trust | Topeka, KS 66610 | $10,466 |
137 | Frank Davis | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $10,320 |
138 | Dewayne Reder | Atchison, KS 66002 | $10,210 |
139 | Philip A Halling | Lancaster, KS 66041 | $10,170 |
140 | Anton & P Brox Rev Liv Trust | Lancaster, KS 66041 | $10,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”