Farm Subsidy information
Barber County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Barber County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 492
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barber County, Kansas totaled $7,979,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Christopher E Boyd -chris & Chelsea Boyd Rev Tr | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $64,301 |
22 | Allan J Maze | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $63,831 |
23 | Terry M Ricke | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $62,047 |
24 | Aaron Traffas | Sharon, KS 67138 | $54,005 |
25 | Ryan T Bedwell | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $52,716 |
26 | Liebst Farms, LLC | Nashville, KS 67112 | $51,376 |
27 | Cargill Ranch LLC | Isabel, KS 67065 | $50,497 |
28 | Bret Allen Mott | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $50,043 |
29 | Dan G Roark | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $46,035 |
30 | Russell Molz | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $45,999 |
31 | John Platt | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $45,216 |
32 | Kelly D Hrencher | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $45,171 |
33 | Chad K Nittler | Lake City, KS 67071 | $43,119 |
34 | Matt Cantrell | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $42,856 |
35 | Rodney D Mcdaniel | Sharon, KS 67138 | $41,966 |
36 | Nathan Harts | Sun City, KS 67143 | $41,427 |
37 | Duane Ricke | Attica, KS 67009 | $40,959 |
38 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $40,943 |
39 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $40,588 |
40 | Mark E Pollock | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $36,639 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”