Production Flexibility Program in Barber County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,102
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Barber County, Kansas totaled $19,340,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Angell Family Rev Trust | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $61,470 |
82 | Albert Harbaugh | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $61,297 |
83 | B & K | Alva, OK 73717 | $61,296 |
84 | Schooley & Schooley | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $60,990 |
85 | Lennes And Marjorie Rankin Trust | Sharon, KS 67138 | $60,774 |
86 | George V Spicer | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $60,015 |
87 | Terry - Garman Famil Wayne Garman | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $59,679 |
88 | Cargill Ranch LLC | Isabel, KS 67065 | $59,165 |
89 | Boyd B Forester Liv Trust Revoc | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $58,883 |
90 | Gene Pollock | Hazelton, KS 67061 | $58,609 |
91 | Berniece Spicer Revocable Trust | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $57,239 |
92 | James L Richards | Neosho Falls, KS 66758 | $57,232 |
93 | Paul Roark | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $56,441 |
94 | James Liebst And Shawn M. Liebst | Nashville, KS 67112 | $56,228 |
95 | Kent L Swartz | Hazelton, KS 67061 | $56,063 |
96 | Ralph And Myra Dick Living Trust | Isabel, KS 67065 | $55,898 |
97 | John Platt | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $55,689 |
98 | Galen Banks | Pratt, KS 67124 | $55,522 |
99 | William G Schrock Trust No 1 | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $55,499 |
100 | Dennis Eugene Colle | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $55,420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”