Farm Subsidy information
Barber County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Barber County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 164
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barber County, Kansas totaled $6,105,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Scott Fischer | Isabel, KS 67065 | $1,695 |
122 | Robert W Fischer | Nashville, KS 67112 | $1,695 |
123 | Henry Hudson | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $1,614 |
124 | Charles F Heydenreich II | Crawfordville, FL 32327 | $1,572 |
125 | Caren J Bennefield | Ray City, GA 31645 | $1,572 |
126 | Prai Family Trust | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $1,536 |
127 | Barbara A Sewing | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $1,535 |
128 | Thom Land And Cattle Co Inc | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $1,530 |
129 | Richard Poland | Isabel, KS 67065 | $1,452 |
130 | The Mark W Aberle & Janice Aberle Living Tr | Wichita, KS 67226 | $1,422 |
131 | , | $1,377 | |
132 | Bryce Boyd | Halstead, KS 67056 | $1,330 |
133 | Debra Davis | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $1,318 |
134 | Vivian Cross | Sun City, KS 67143 | $1,282 |
135 | Steve Sterling | Alva, OK 73717 | $1,270 |
136 | Glen A Dirks Rev Trust | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $1,236 |
137 | , | $1,236 | |
138 | Eddie J Lipscomb | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $1,187 |
139 | Betsy L Lipscomb | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $1,187 |
140 | Marilyn R Traffas | Sharon, KS 67138 | $1,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”