Total Conservation Programs in Barber County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 695
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Barber County, Kansas totaled $16,824,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Lloyd K Bower | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $34,300 |
142 | Gene Blackwelder | Meridian, ID 83642 | $33,853 |
143 | Robert Earl Standish | Saint John, KS 67576 | $33,740 |
144 | Goemann Family Rev Trust A | La Mesa, CA 91941 | $33,266 |
145 | T3 LLC | Harper, KS 67058 | $33,070 |
146 | Albert Blahut | Sharon, KS 67138 | $33,046 |
147 | Jack Lambert | Coats, KS 67028 | $32,486 |
148 | Jimmie D Mccullough | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $32,397 |
149 | Carrol W Gibson | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $31,410 |
150 | Landwehr 93 Family Trust | Garden Plain, KS 67050 | $31,375 |
151 | James Liebst And Shawn M. Liebst | Nashville, KS 67112 | $31,333 |
152 | Jimmie F Stephens | Pratt, KS 67124 | $31,078 |
153 | George W Miller | Pratt, KS 67124 | $30,856 |
154 | James L Truax | Peabody, KS 66866 | $30,755 |
155 | Roy L & Stella M Thompson Rev Liv | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $30,740 |
156 | Cecil I Tucker Jr Revocable Trust | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $30,307 |
157 | Wendell R Howell | Preston, KS 67583 | $30,215 |
158 | Helyn J Kuhn | Scottsdale, AZ 85261 | $30,185 |
159 | Mary K Miller Irrevocable Trust No. 1 | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $29,663 |
160 | Jim Hart | Protection, KS 67127 | $29,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”