Direct Payment Program in Barton County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,843
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Barton County, Kansas totaled $51,338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Meyer Farms Of Ellinwood Lp | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $148,903 |
82 | Craig Robl | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $146,473 |
83 | Hanson Farming Co | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $145,549 |
84 | Corey Robl | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $144,698 |
85 | Becker Land And Cattle | Russell, KS 67665 | $143,570 |
86 | Timothy Frieb | Olmitz, KS 67564 | $142,875 |
87 | Dale B Stoss | Olmitz, KS 67564 | $142,662 |
88 | Kevin Mauler | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $141,627 |
89 | F E Farms LLC | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $140,024 |
90 | Ell-bar Farm Inc | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $138,454 |
91 | David Evers | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $135,791 |
92 | Kenneth L Nicolet | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $133,954 |
93 | Marjorie Schriner | Albert, KS 67511 | $132,869 |
94 | Maurice A Yarmer | Russell, KS 67665 | $132,693 |
95 | Greg Alan Bitter | Hoisington, KS 67544 | $132,041 |
96 | Kevin L Schartz | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $130,680 |
97 | William Stoss Jr | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $130,576 |
98 | Richard E Klepper | La Veta, CO 81055 | $129,481 |
99 | Warren W Tindall | Hoisington, KS 67544 | $129,204 |
100 | Chad Churchill | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $128,141 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”