Total Conservation Programs in Bourbon County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 102
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $260,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shayne Crawford | Fayetteville, AR 72701 | $4,247 |
22 | Marianna Daugherty | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $4,079 |
23 | Kelly Tate | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $4,014 |
24 | Larry D Snyder | Fulton, KS 66738 | $3,543 |
25 | James Lind | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $3,452 |
26 | Redgate LLC | Centerton, AR 72719 | $3,276 |
27 | Dan S Ramsey | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $3,151 |
28 | , | $3,110 | |
29 | Lynne D Oharah | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $3,062 |
30 | Donald E Farmer | Shawnee Mission, KS 66216 | $2,828 |
31 | Jane S Lutz | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $2,510 |
32 | Randy Milligan | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $2,455 |
33 | Robert L Collins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $2,400 |
34 | Albert W Rehkop Jr Irrevocable Trust Agreement | Leawood, KS 66209 | $2,324 |
35 | David L Collins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $2,317 |
36 | Mike W Karleskint | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $2,205 |
37 | L E Pembleton Jr | Olathe, KS 66062 | $2,124 |
38 | Orval E Shinn Irrevocable Trust | Bronson, KS 66716 | $1,960 |
39 | Howard Beth | Calvert City, KY 42029 | $1,943 |
40 | Larry Beth | Kingsport, TN 37660 | $1,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”