Farm Subsidy information
Bourbon County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Bourbon County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 479
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $7,437,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William A Griffith | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $15,251 |
82 | Slick Rock Cattle Company LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $15,182 |
83 | Andy Eck | Redfield, KS 66769 | $14,845 |
84 | David Renard | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $14,803 |
85 | Frank Madison | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,404 |
86 | Robert C Query | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,196 |
87 | Peggy White | Mound City, KS 66056 | $14,102 |
88 | Mike Younggren | Redfield, KS 66769 | $13,968 |
89 | William Holeman | Bronson, KS 66716 | $13,896 |
90 | Clayton Graham Nading | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $13,889 |
91 | Jonathan Thornberry | New Waverly, TX 77358 | $13,843 |
92 | , | $13,820 | |
93 | Charlie C Ball | Prescott, KS 66767 | $13,730 |
94 | Terry West | Redfield, KS 66769 | $13,500 |
95 | Timothy H Emerson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $13,226 |
96 | John David Griffiths | Fulton, KS 66738 | $13,139 |
97 | Travis J Duncan | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $13,079 |
98 | Tony Karleskint | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $12,909 |
99 | Doris Ericson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $12,875 |
100 | Terry Kunstel | Arcadia, KS 66711 | $12,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”