Farm Subsidy information
Bourbon County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Bourbon County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $9,675,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James Malveaux | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $16,645 |
102 | Timothy H Emerson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $16,575 |
103 | Greg Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $16,505 |
104 | Chad Dewayne Wise | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $16,280 |
105 | Dean E Keating | Fulton, KS 66738 | $16,112 |
106 | Gary D Daylong | Bronson, KS 66716 | $15,882 |
107 | , | $15,747 | |
108 | Charles W Keith | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $15,668 |
109 | Robert L Collins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $15,575 |
110 | Kevin Woodward | Bronson, KS 66716 | $15,496 |
111 | D. Wade Farms, LLC | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $15,314 |
112 | Kevin Womelsdorf | Redfield, KS 66769 | $14,970 |
113 | Delbert And Darla Crays Trust Agreement Crays | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,703 |
114 | Daniel R Wunderly | Redfield, KS 66769 | $14,578 |
115 | Weston E Shrewsbury | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,410 |
116 | Roy Cummings | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,376 |
117 | Joseph Phillip Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $14,356 |
118 | Kevin Covey | Elsmore, KS 66732 | $14,259 |
119 | John W Endicott | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $14,164 |
120 | Travis M Stewart Dba D/m Farms | Bronson, KS 66716 | $14,099 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”