Loan Deficiency in Bourbon County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 686
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $3,597,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry D Snyder | Fulton, KS 66738 | $8,585 |
102 | Dewaine Geiger | Joplin, MO 64804 | $8,447 |
103 | Greg Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $8,205 |
104 | Jerry Worrell | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,956 |
105 | Shirley Towles | Fulton, KS 66738 | $7,864 |
106 | Jerry L Valentine | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,796 |
107 | Buford R Stewart | Bronson, KS 66716 | $7,778 |
108 | Ned Caldwell | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,710 |
109 | Tom Karleskint | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,689 |
110 | Elmer Jack Adamson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,686 |
111 | Gary L Houston | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,315 |
112 | Leo Lager | Clementon, NJ 08021 | $7,081 |
113 | Robert A Miller | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $7,015 |
114 | Kevin Seested | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $6,891 |
115 | Bennie Augustin Jr | Walnut, KS 66780 | $6,692 |
116 | Raymond Joe Savage | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $6,615 |
117 | Melvin Seaver | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $6,513 |
118 | Rockin R Ranch | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $6,381 |
119 | James H Lyons | Fulton, KS 66738 | $6,320 |
120 | Lloyd Callow | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $5,901 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”