Total Commodity Programs in Bourbon County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,213
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $46,840,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | John Younggren | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $55,376 |
182 | John D Traul | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $55,345 |
183 | John E Snyder | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $54,528 |
184 | Max Bradbury | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $53,952 |
185 | Florine Stewart | Bronson, KS 66716 | $53,947 |
186 | Robert C Query | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $53,683 |
187 | Johnson Ranch Trust | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $53,006 |
188 | Jerry Worrell | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $52,723 |
189 | Shirley Yeager Dba Englehart Heir | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $52,692 |
190 | Robert R Minor | Fulton, KS 66738 | $52,502 |
191 | Karl Umphenour | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $52,244 |
192 | Zachary Stephan | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $52,080 |
193 | Buckbrush Farm C/o Matt Ida | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $52,076 |
194 | Johnny Endicott | Fulton, KS 66738 | $51,915 |
195 | Lawrence Lane Cutler | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $51,842 |
196 | Eugene Farmer | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $50,458 |
197 | Ryan Tuchscherer | Glendale, CO 80246 | $50,392 |
198 | Glenn M Post | Redfield, KS 66769 | $50,367 |
199 | James F Savage | Rantoul, KS 66079 | $49,888 |
200 | Larry Quirin | Redfield, KS 66769 | $49,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”