Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Bourbon County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 322
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $5,069,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wyatt Joseph Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $286,932 |
2 | Dennis J Meech Dba Triple M Farms | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $252,182 |
3 | Kenneth Lee Snyder | Fulton, KS 66738 | $211,373 |
4 | Muddy Water Farms LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $185,393 |
5 | Joe Warren | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $173,171 |
6 | Roger Bradford | Bronson, KS 66716 | $139,733 |
7 | Brian D Snyder | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $138,530 |
8 | G-three LLC | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $138,368 |
9 | Jason Koch | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $112,999 |
10 | Mill Creek Cattle Co | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $111,969 |
11 | Jim Meech Farms | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $101,493 |
12 | Mark Bohlken | Garland, KS 66741 | $89,984 |
13 | Joseph Phillip Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $76,136 |
14 | Maven Ag Partners LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $73,787 |
15 | Phillip R Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $73,338 |
16 | Travis M Stewart Dba D/m Farms | Bronson, KS 66716 | $72,949 |
17 | Gale Darrel & Wm George Ptr G Thr | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $72,694 |
18 | Rudy Simpson | Arcadia, KS 66711 | $72,240 |
19 | Richard H Perry Revocable Trust | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $69,377 |
20 | Matthew R Simpson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $68,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>