Counter Cyclical Program in Butler County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,379
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Butler County, Kansas totaled $2,651,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Reynold Entz Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $10,434 |
62 | Eldon Esau | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $10,291 |
63 | Robert K Busenitz | Benton, KS 67017 | $10,087 |
64 | Dan Fagan | Benton, KS 67017 | $10,002 |
65 | Lyle G Wiebe | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $10,000 |
66 | Edgar Harder Revocable Trust | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $9,910 |
67 | Plum Grove Farms | Potwin, KS 67123 | $9,898 |
68 | Gerald W Pike | Wichita, KS 67204 | $9,700 |
69 | Kendall Claassen | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $9,661 |
70 | Thurman Entz | Newton, KS 67114 | $9,660 |
71 | Donald Harder | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $9,652 |
72 | Darryl W Meyersick Rev Trust | Benton, KS 67017 | $9,412 |
73 | Howard Trust The | Donna, TX 78537 | $9,206 |
74 | Golden Rule Farms | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $9,005 |
75 | Walter A Penner Rev Tr | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $8,976 |
76 | Lloyd H Wiebe | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $8,894 |
77 | Derek Claassen | Valley Center, KS 67147 | $8,845 |
78 | Frank Turner | El Dorado, KS 67042 | $8,666 |
79 | Jerrol Kim Claassen | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $8,565 |
80 | Willie E Entz | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $8,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”