Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chase County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 87
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $660,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $4,175 |
42 | Buchman Joint Living Trust | Burdick, KS 66838 | $3,810 |
43 | Bradley J Thiessen | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,800 |
44 | Gary D Bruch | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,793 |
45 | Eddie Danford | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,723 |
46 | Shawn Potts | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $3,638 |
47 | Cole S Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,495 |
48 | Tim E Miser | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,384 |
49 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,317 |
50 | Michael G Ingalls | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,943 |
51 | Glenn E Unruh | Strong City, KS 66869 | $2,907 |
52 | Bar W Bar Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,898 |
53 | Tom Burton | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $2,849 |
54 | Bold Enterprises LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $2,463 |
55 | B Rex Buchman | Burdick, KS 66838 | $2,347 |
56 | Kent Crawford | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,346 |
57 | Robert Bell | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,193 |
58 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $2,168 |
59 | Eidman Farms LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $2,166 |
60 | Steve Eidman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”