Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,250
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $73,422,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dudley - Dudley Dona J Donahue | Durham, KS 67438 | $315,779 |
42 | Charles A Pilgrim Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $313,101 |
43 | Craig A Cooper | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $273,974 |
44 | Raymond Barrett | Emporia, KS 66801 | $264,452 |
45 | Bradley J Thiessen | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $261,804 |
46 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $261,740 |
47 | James C Donahue | Durham, KS 67438 | $252,030 |
48 | Williams And Brown LLC | Apex, NC 27523 | $251,779 |
49 | Cedar Creek Ranch Inc | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $249,328 |
50 | David B Davies Rev Trust | Osage City, KS 66523 | $243,904 |
51 | Shawn Potts | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $243,667 |
52 | Elmo Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $240,009 |
53 | John R Spinden | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $237,560 |
54 | Murco LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $223,464 |
55 | Eddie Danford | Strong City, KS 66869 | $218,448 |
56 | Wildcat Ranch LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $216,667 |
57 | Wittker Farms | Strong City, KS 66869 | $216,058 |
58 | Langenegger Brothers Inc | Burns, KS 66840 | $212,243 |
59 | Howard E Blender | Emporia, KS 66801 | $211,418 |
60 | Hendrika Vos | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $210,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”