Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $3,240,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,803 |
82 | Eric Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,398 |
83 | B Rex Buchman | Burdick, KS 66838 | $2,347 |
84 | Joshua W Mayes | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $2,280 |
85 | Jane B Koger Trust | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $2,074 |
86 | Joseph F Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,040 |
87 | Joseph Lloyd Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $1,998 |
88 | Pat Ringler | Emporia, KS 66801 | $1,988 |
89 | Wesley J Bailey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $1,939 |
90 | Paul Arsenault | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $1,888 |
91 | Jason Lewis | Strong City, KS 66869 | $1,876 |
92 | Donald C Immasche Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $1,767 |
93 | Bergh Farms | Erie, CO 80516 | $1,760 |
94 | John Rausch | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $1,387 |
95 | Ronald E Kelsheimer | Strong City, KS 66869 | $1,385 |
96 | Matthew Hatcher | Strong City, KS 66869 | $1,374 |
97 | Justin D Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $1,369 |
98 | Virginia M Peterson Rev Trust Dated May 10, 2013 | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $1,163 |
99 | Luke W Wessel | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $1,135 |
100 | Rock Creek Farms | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”