Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,250
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $73,422,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mark Danford | Strong City, KS 66869 | $165,484 |
82 | Anderson Cattle Co. Inc. | Emporia, KS 66801 | $165,183 |
83 | Leslie L Lalouette Rev Trust | Florence, KS 66851 | $161,753 |
84 | Kevin Hannigan | Strong City, KS 66869 | $160,285 |
85 | Michael A Harris | Strong City, KS 66869 | $155,424 |
86 | Flying W Ranch LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $154,919 |
87 | Daniel & Kathleen Miller Revocable Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $149,035 |
88 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $147,272 |
89 | John Lind | Emporia, KS 66801 | $146,624 |
90 | Charlene M Palenske | Strong City, KS 66869 | $145,619 |
91 | Alan L Phipps | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $144,396 |
92 | Samuel L Griffin | Burns, KS 66840 | $144,235 |
93 | Arman A Miller | Bonner Springs, KS 66012 | $144,141 |
94 | Joseph A Isch | Lyndon, KS 66451 | $144,095 |
95 | Jason D Shamburg | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $144,095 |
96 | Richard L Mann | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $138,689 |
97 | Wittker Farms LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $138,074 |
98 | Pretzer Farms | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $137,589 |
99 | Donahue Hayhook Ranch East LLC | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $135,288 |
100 | Roger Kohls | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $135,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”