Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 447
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $18,845,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Tim E Miser | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $51,007 |
102 | Wildcat Ranch LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $48,190 |
103 | Anthony M Dold & Virginia R Dold Rev Living Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $47,329 |
104 | Mashed O Ranch LLC | Prairie Village, KS 66208 | $46,916 |
105 | Daniel M Unruh | Galva, KS 67443 | $46,536 |
106 | Tom Burton | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $45,828 |
107 | Barbara F Godfrey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $45,791 |
108 | Mark Eldon Reed | Courtland, KS 66939 | $45,774 |
109 | Ryan G Patrick | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $45,056 |
110 | , | $43,218 | |
111 | Sauble Cattle Company LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $42,586 |
112 | Wagonwheel Farms Inc | Florence, KS 66851 | $41,779 |
113 | A Arrow Cattle LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $41,628 |
114 | John Mccurry | Burrton, KS 67020 | $41,540 |
115 | Harry Floyd Livestock | Waynesboro, TN 38485 | $41,256 |
116 | Tony J Redeker | Olpe, KS 66865 | $41,032 |
117 | R E Mcdowell III | South Greenfield, MO 65752 | $41,022 |
118 | Eidman Farms LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $40,752 |
119 | Sippel Living Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $40,063 |
120 | Mark W Potts | Strong City, KS 66869 | $40,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”