Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 163
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $3,414,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dawn Enderwood | Edmond, OK 73012 | $1,310 |
142 | Barbara Jean Eidman Trust | Strong City, KS 66869 | $1,077 |
143 | Frank Buffington-franklin W And Carol J Buffin | Emporia, KS 66801 | $1,021 |
144 | Harold K Wells II | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $1,016 |
145 | Dennis Stotts | Emporia, KS 66801 | $976 |
146 | Charles R Maggard II | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $886 |
147 | Justin D Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $798 |
148 | Patrick H Sauble | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $780 |
149 | Alan Dyck | Los Angeles, CA 90025 | $546 |
150 | Charles Armagost | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $510 |
151 | Stout Brothers Farm | Springfield, MO 65804 | $464 |
152 | Dian Garr | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $454 |
153 | Stephen Wamser | Henderson, NV 89074 | $440 |
154 | Charles Armagost | Strong City, KS 66869 | $327 |
155 | Ronald E Kelsheimer | Strong City, KS 66869 | $266 |
156 | Dennis Hague | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $260 |
157 | Burton Louis Harshman | Marion, KS 66861 | $233 |
158 | Timothy Donahue-timothy Patrick D | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $228 |
159 | Kenneth Warren Tanner | Emporia, KS 66801 | $209 |
160 | Barbara L Stotts | Emporia, KS 66801 | $161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”