Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 259
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $1,282,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Elmo Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $932 |
182 | Mark Danford | Strong City, KS 66869 | $922 |
183 | Eugene Matile | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $891 |
184 | Christopher S Burton | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $878 |
185 | Alberta B Emch | Tabor, IA 51653 | $867 |
186 | Everett Cress | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $860 |
187 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $842 |
188 | Kevin C Hammond | Lebo, KS 66856 | $828 |
189 | Thomas I Kirk | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $806 |
190 | Walter L Blount Jr | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $792 |
191 | Bill Fillmore | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $758 |
192 | Roger Kohls Jr | Albert, KS 67511 | $745 |
193 | Kenneth L Rogers | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $738 |
194 | Clifford J Hett Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $734 |
195 | Norman R Galle Trust No 1 | Junction City, KS 66441 | $695 |
196 | Susan Hardesty | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $675 |
197 | Larry Morgan | Hesston, KS 67062 | $648 |
198 | Alan L Phipps | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $636 |
199 | Dale C Wealand | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $621 |
200 | Charles Swift | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”