Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 270
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $7,714,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alan L Phipps | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $42,663 |
42 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $41,803 |
43 | Trey H Hinkson III | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $40,635 |
44 | Flying W Ranch LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $38,995 |
45 | Alan J Neuberger | Overland Park, KS 66209 | $36,251 |
46 | T W Burton | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $36,135 |
47 | Leslie L Lalouette Rev Trust | Florence, KS 66851 | $32,284 |
48 | Mark Danford | Strong City, KS 66869 | $30,325 |
49 | Hal J Palenske | Strong City, KS 66869 | $30,066 |
50 | Charlene M Palenske | Strong City, KS 66869 | $29,960 |
51 | Gary D Bruch | Strong City, KS 66869 | $28,276 |
52 | Randal Peterson | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $28,204 |
53 | Franklin D Higgs Jr | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $27,621 |
54 | Hendrika Vos | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $26,279 |
55 | Jerald L Rowland | Emporia, KS 66801 | $25,623 |
56 | Williams And Brown LLC | Apex, NC 27523 | $25,487 |
57 | Wittker Farms LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $25,450 |
58 | Charles A Pilgrim Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $24,247 |
59 | James B Barrett | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $22,769 |
60 | Eugene Matile | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $22,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”