Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chase County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 139
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $469,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bar W Bar Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $7,291 |
22 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $7,105 |
23 | Donnie R Swift | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $6,595 |
24 | Burkhart Heathman Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,556 |
25 | Tom Sollner | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,404 |
26 | Eric Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,342 |
27 | Neal Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $5,125 |
28 | Michael A Harris | Strong City, KS 66869 | $4,993 |
29 | Charles Tom Jones | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $4,841 |
30 | Donald C Immasche Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $4,051 |
31 | Randal Peterson | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,822 |
32 | Beef Productions Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,810 |
33 | Joseph F Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,750 |
34 | Pat Ringler | Emporia, KS 66801 | $3,600 |
35 | Alan L Phipps | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $3,193 |
36 | Hannigan Hay And Grain LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,174 |
37 | Trenton Heathman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,096 |
38 | Gary D Bruch | Strong City, KS 66869 | $2,993 |
39 | John O Wilson-john O Wilson Revocable Trust | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,662 |
40 | Kent Crawford | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”