Wheat Subsidies in Chase County, Kansas, 2018
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 205
Recipients of Wheat Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $278,000 in in 2018.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wheat Subsidies 2018 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Pretzer | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $13,162 |
2 | Heathman Farms LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $10,207 |
3 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $10,058 |
4 | Larry Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $8,668 |
5 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $8,276 |
6 | Soyez Brothers LLC * | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $7,925 |
7 | Eidman Farms LLC * | Emporia, KS 66801 | $7,914 |
8 | Giger Land And Cattle Corporation * | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $7,505 |
9 | Juanita Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,427 |
10 | Palenske Ranch Inc * | Strong City, KS 66869 | $5,012 |
11 | Howard D Nurnberg Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $4,571 |
12 | Timothy-timothy Patr P Donahue | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $4,150 |
13 | Pioneer Ranch Lc * | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,925 |
14 | Kevin Hannigan | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,734 |
15 | Keith J Glanville Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,462 |
16 | Alan L Phipps | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $3,176 |
17 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,168 |
18 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $3,059 |
19 | Daniel E Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $2,980 |
20 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $2,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.