Counter Cyclical Program in Chautauqua County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 116
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chautauqua County, Kansas totaled $141,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hillcrest Farms Of Kansas Inc | Havana, KS 67347 | $45,484 |
2 | Steve Osburn | Elk City, KS 67344 | $35,482 |
3 | Beason Farm | Elk City, KS 67344 | $17,910 |
4 | Edwin E Bowman | Sedan, KS 67361 | $3,484 |
5 | Joe H Massey | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $2,522 |
6 | Dave Todd | Havana, KS 67347 | $2,235 |
7 | The Rinck River Bottom Farms Inc | Peru, KS 67360 | $2,172 |
8 | Todd Massey | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $1,472 |
9 | Mark Alan Mcdaniel | Caney, KS 67333 | $1,343 |
10 | Mitchell Foster | Sedan, KS 67361 | $1,338 |
11 | The Pallet Company | Caney, KS 67333 | $1,276 |
12 | Call Dairy Inc | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $1,226 |
13 | Ronald V Odette Family Limited Pa | Burbank, OK 74633 | $1,205 |
14 | Floyd W Montgomery | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $1,149 |
15 | Nellie Moore | Havana, KS 67347 | $1,146 |
16 | Ronald G Denney | Independence, KS 67301 | $962 |
17 | James W Bell | Moline, KS 67353 | $882 |
18 | Paul J Fulsom Trust | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $843 |
19 | Richard T Cooper | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $774 |
20 | David Alan & Karen M Lewis Trust | Sedan, KS 67361 | $753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>