Total Commodity Programs in Chautauqua County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chautauqua County, Kansas totaled $156,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beason Farm | Elk City, KS 67344 | $42,998 |
2 | Edwin E Bowman | Sedan, KS 67361 | $34,557 |
3 | Steve - Stephen E & Jane E Osburn Rev Osburn | Elk City, KS 67344 | $17,355 |
4 | Steve Mack Rinck | Peru, KS 67360 | $6,553 |
5 | Stanley David Scott | Caney, KS 67333 | $6,080 |
6 | Howard R Hawkins | Grenola, KS 67346 | $5,998 |
7 | Gary Henderson | Havana, KS 67347 | $3,846 |
8 | James J Rinck | Niotaze, KS 67355 | $3,150 |
9 | Rolan Leniton | Grenola, KS 67346 | $3,088 |
10 | Sydney Aleysh Moore | Sedan, KS 67361 | $2,657 |
11 | , | $2,263 | |
12 | Gary A Kelley | Sedan, KS 67361 | $2,011 |
13 | William Dwayne Lampson | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $1,799 |
14 | Randy L Roberts | Sedan, KS 67361 | $1,692 |
15 | William Cannon & Charlotte Ann Trautman Trust | Loma Linda, MO 64804 | $1,657 |
16 | Dave Todd | Havana, KS 67347 | $1,584 |
17 | , | $1,473 | |
18 | Steven V Walker | Moline, KS 67353 | $1,438 |
19 | Robert L Rinck Rev Trust | Niotaze, KS 67355 | $1,250 |
20 | Seller Drycreek Farms, LLC | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $1,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>