Counter Cyclical Program in Cherokee County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 883
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cherokee County, Kansas totaled $1,236,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brandon Coons | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,736 |
82 | Circle F Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,706 |
83 | John R Cassell | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,673 |
84 | David Waugh | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $3,540 |
85 | Sara Lee Johnston | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $3,460 |
86 | Martin Grain Farms Corp | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,397 |
87 | Stanley Edmondson | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,390 |
88 | Calvin Bower | Carthage, MO 64836 | $3,390 |
89 | Ronald E Westervelt | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,380 |
90 | James L Ratcliff | Vinita, OK 74301 | $3,278 |
91 | Richard Bowin | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $3,180 |
92 | Steven J Tanner | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,168 |
93 | Wallie Joe Hall | Columbus, KS 66725 | $3,134 |
94 | Clayton J Jones | Scammon, KS 66773 | $3,094 |
95 | Harold O'malley Trust | Scammon, KS 66773 | $2,973 |
96 | Ted David Edmondson | Columbus, KS 66725 | $2,956 |
97 | Chris David Edmondson | Columbus, KS 66725 | $2,956 |
98 | Jarrett Brothers Farm Inc | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $2,942 |
99 | Jeff Clark | Columbus, KS 66725 | $2,853 |
100 | Moore Johnson | Columbus, KS 66725 | $2,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”