Farm Subsidy information
Cherokee County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Cherokee County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,729
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cherokee County, Kansas totaled $203,682,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Harold D Jones | Columbus, KS 66725 | $417,031 |
82 | Ellis P Westervelt | Columbus, KS 66725 | $412,210 |
83 | Jarrett Brothers Farm Inc | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $407,149 |
84 | Erick Bryce Jessee | Columbus, KS 66725 | $403,495 |
85 | Mercer Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $397,401 |
86 | Mussa Grain And Cattle Inc | Scammon, KS 66773 | $393,218 |
87 | Richard Bowin | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $383,109 |
88 | Don W Hutto Living Trust | Columbus, KS 66725 | $382,242 |
89 | Philip A Roth | Columbus, KS 66725 | $381,620 |
90 | Raymond E Burns | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $379,579 |
91 | Dennis W Grotheer Living Trust | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $373,395 |
92 | Clayton J Jones | Scammon, KS 66773 | $367,432 |
93 | Pyne Farm Inc | Jenks, OK 74037 | $362,230 |
94 | Mary Elizabeth O'malley | Weir, KS 66781 | $359,515 |
95 | Meyer Ranch Inc | Weir, KS 66781 | $357,927 |
96 | Douglas R Jones | Scammon, KS 66773 | $355,504 |
97 | Murl Dean Robison | Columbus, KS 66725 | $342,756 |
98 | Saporito Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $340,159 |
99 | Smith Farm & Seed Inc. | Cherokee, KS 66724 | $338,606 |
100 | Wallie Joe Hall | Columbus, KS 66725 | $333,443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”