Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cherokee County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 341
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cherokee County, Kansas totaled $606,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Joseph L Mooney | Columbus, KS 66725 | $45,774 |
2 | Rebecka Cudney-hardy | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $35,843 |
3 | Freeman Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $18,249 |
4 | Leon King | Columbus, KS 66725 | $16,957 |
5 | John Robert Gaither | Columbus, KS 66725 | $16,111 |
6 | Roger R Draeger Revocable Trust | Galena, KS 66739 | $16,021 |
7 | Jeff Jackson | Chetopa, KS 67336 | $15,002 |
8 | , | $11,538 | |
9 | Brett Warstler | Galena, KS 66739 | $11,449 |
10 | Carl Ed Martin | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $10,276 |
11 | Carroll Soper Jr | Scammon, KS 66773 | $8,437 |
12 | Fred R Heistand | Columbus, KS 66725 | $8,414 |
13 | Ryan Martin | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $7,945 |
14 | Stone Brothers Farms LLC | Galena, KS 66739 | $6,736 |
15 | John Tim Kellogg | Riverton, KS 66770 | $5,922 |
16 | Curtis Tyler Hargon | Quapaw, OK 74363 | $5,787 |
17 | Michael E Cassell | Chetopa, KS 67336 | $5,712 |
18 | Jody Hill | Columbus, KS 66725 | $5,685 |
19 | Bennie W Capron | Columbus, KS 66725 | $5,635 |
20 | Bob Shanks | Columbus, KS 66725 | $5,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>