Conservation Reserve Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 322
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $1,234,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Christian Unity Press | Flint, MI 48507 | $11,292 |
22 | Olive Edie Trust | Peralta, NM 87042 | $10,686 |
23 | Carol Hemken | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $10,552 |
24 | Steven C Workman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,448 |
25 | Jenny E Busse | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,410 |
26 | Donna E Zweygardt Rev Lvg Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,376 |
27 | Willard H Zweygardt Restated Rvoc Tr | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,376 |
28 | Fairview Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,213 |
29 | Timothy Laing | Aurora, CO 80018 | $10,076 |
30 | Zaz Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $10,028 |
31 | Jeanice Thomas | Marion, KS 66861 | $9,823 |
32 | Roger L Moore | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $9,237 |
33 | Cody J Whitney | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $9,031 |
34 | Patrick R Stuart | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $8,809 |
35 | Hansons Ag Investments Lllp | Burlington, CO 80807 | $8,402 |
36 | Douglas J Flemming | Bird City, KS 67731 | $8,355 |
37 | Anderson Ranch LLC | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $7,971 |
38 | Douglas J Cress | Sterling, CO 80751 | $7,892 |
39 | Randall H Holzwarth | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $7,832 |
40 | Jeffrey L Brant | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $7,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”