Conservation Reserve Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 322
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $1,234,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mary M Brant | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $7,755 |
42 | Scott Northrup Rev Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $7,721 |
43 | Delmer W Bandel | Carrollton, OH 44615 | $7,467 |
44 | Ruth E Milliken | St. Francis, KS 67756 | $7,343 |
45 | Lillich Trust Of 1997 | Madison, WI 53718 | $7,263 |
46 | Karen M Uplinger | Syracuse, NY 13210 | $6,888 |
47 | Robert J Uplinger Jr | Wichita, KS 67226 | $6,888 |
48 | Daryl L Donahey And Sherry M Donahey Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $6,848 |
49 | Busse Grain & Cattle Co | Bird City, KS 67731 | $6,724 |
50 | Robert O Kricke & Patricia L Kricke Trust | Denver, CO 80209 | $6,704 |
51 | Janelle Walter | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $6,656 |
52 | Krien Family Ltd Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $6,650 |
53 | Nancy Turner | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $6,569 |
54 | William Q Gattshall - William Q Gattshall Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $6,423 |
55 | Albert Keller Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $6,296 |
56 | , | $6,251 | |
57 | Roger Samler | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $6,244 |
58 | Mitchell Hilt | Nashville, TN 37212 | $6,157 |
59 | Nancy Anderson | Omaha, NE 68106 | $6,001 |
60 | Rlj Group LLC | Aguanga, CA 92536 | $5,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”