Market Gains in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 137
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jerry W Knapp & Betty J Knapp Rev Lvg Trust | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $5,283 |
42 | L Dean Knapp & Theresa Knapp Rev Lvg Trust | Bird City, KS 67731 | $5,200 |
43 | Lyle Dean Knapp & Theresa Knapp R | Bird City, KS 67731 | $5,200 |
44 | Js Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $4,921 |
45 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $4,921 |
46 | Deborah E Ballinger | Sulphur, OK 73086 | $4,439 |
47 | Ervin E Peters | Bird City, KS 67731 | $4,392 |
48 | Ted Rodney Partch | Bird City, KS 67731 | $4,044 |
49 | Dual Equities | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,835 |
50 | Keith H Mccall Rev Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,554 |
51 | Don L Gilliland | Bird City, KS 67731 | $3,460 |
52 | Dale W May | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,249 |
53 | Daniel Stephens | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $3,205 |
54 | Ron Ham | Benkelman, NE 69021 | $3,008 |
55 | Roger R Zweygardt | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,834 |
56 | Melissa L Zweygardt | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,834 |
57 | Robert T Walter | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,708 |
58 | Amy J Hendricks | Bird City, KS 67731 | $2,681 |
59 | Alan Archer | Mcdonald, KS 67745 | $2,677 |
60 | Ervin Hilt Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”