Loan Deficiency in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,406
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $18,922,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stanley Lamb | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $62,794 |
82 | Gilbert & Shirley Ochsner Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $62,682 |
83 | Lyle Dean Knapp & Theresa Knapp R | Bird City, KS 67731 | $62,563 |
84 | Thomas H Smull | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $61,115 |
85 | Bracelin Brothers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $60,630 |
86 | L Dean Knapp & Theresa Knapp Rev Lvg Trust | Bird City, KS 67731 | $57,594 |
87 | Bill C Neitzel | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $57,147 |
88 | Lonnie D Willis | Bird City, KS 67731 | $56,786 |
89 | Clayton Janicke | Bird City, KS 67731 | $56,324 |
90 | Orth Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $56,133 |
91 | W H Smull | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $56,077 |
92 | Lynn D Glasco | Bird City, KS 67731 | $55,738 |
93 | Melissa L Zweygardt | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $53,234 |
94 | W Gary Leach | St Francis, KS 67756 | $53,095 |
95 | David Flemming | Bird City, KS 67731 | $52,850 |
96 | William Kelly Gienger | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $51,173 |
97 | Gene Mears | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $51,088 |
98 | Robert J Klie Rev Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $50,793 |
99 | Thomas L Bandel Rev Living Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $50,344 |
100 | Lynn R Officer | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $50,310 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”